Mediumship. A misunderstood and distorted mechanism.

Javi James
May 19
5 min read

I felt compelled to share this article because I haven't found any texts that address this topic with the approach I take here—I hope you enjoy it.

I begin with this epigraph: where there is play, there will always be some manipulation, with individuals tasked with corrupting good habits and customs.

In principle, every human being has the capacity—to a greater or lesser degree—to optimize their mediumistic abilities. Some are born with a neural configuration that allows this mechanism to function at a supercharged level, although the focus tends to be very specific. For example, speaking with deceased people. This is only part of mediumship; it doesn't define it—I will elaborate on this later. Everyone uses their abilities in their own way; nothing is inherently right or wrong, just different.

Every extrasensory ability is subject to a specific—unique—neural dynamic. Often, and paradoxically, this same dynamic prevents the individual from managing these abilities, causing disorders and conflicts of all kinds. In other words, extrasensory ability requires emotional intelligence—they are directly proportional. If this isn't the case, there will be many setbacks in that individual's life. Their behavior could be quite erratic, although eventually positive—it's all very relative. This applies not only to mediumship but also to telepathy, telekinesis, clairvoyance, and everything that falls under the umbrella of parapsychology.

I'll digress for a moment. Parapsychology, esotericism, and metaphysics tend to be interpreted very subjectively because the science of psychotronics, which emerged in the 1950s, is not widely understood. In fact, there's nothing very concrete about it. However, and quite by chance, this is the science that has sprung from me, and today I redefine it as Neuropsychotronics—modern parapsychology. Through it, I can objectively explain and justify what has been interpreted as subjective. And I do so through a logical symbiosis between universal principles and the known laws of physics.

Let me return to the narrative. Mediums, in general, can be exposed to prejudice from those who are unaware of these conditions, and this is further exacerbated by misinformation and manipulation. It's clear that there are also fraudsters and charlatans, not genuine mediums, but they exist everywhere. This manipulation I'm referring to was already evident in Freud's time. Back then, neurological clinical trials were conducted within séances with mediums, but the conclusive results were not made public; they were hidden.

Logically, "medium" refers to being a medium. The question is, a medium for what? In the case of those who deliver messages from the deceased, it's clear they establish a bridge between themselves and the consciousness of the deceased. But someone who is capable of bridging the gap between what we believe we are and the one who creates what we believe we are is also a medium, because they are creating a bridge between themselves and their superconsciousness—this mechanism is also known as quantum astral projection. The reference bridge requires hypnosis, which means "the great synapse that allows awakening"—in simple terms, we're talking about self-listening with progressive fidelity, and that's what I try to induce in the patient during a session. When this hypnosis achieves perfect tuning through constant practice, a prevailing mediumship occurs, which gradually optimizes the level of consciousness, and with it, the emotional quotient—which was also previously required. This condition will gradually allow for optimal mastery of all extrasensory abilities—which, in general, takes years.

The channels that many medium therapists establish have varying degrees of definition—they are more or less fidelized—and are subject to multiple factors, starting with the parameters of electrical energy—voltage and intensity, amplitude and frequency. Imagine a phone call with a lot of noise and interference; it would be something like that, and that's why listening is so important. In all cases, there will be electromagnetic interventions that will alter judgment, to a greater or lesser extent—they can be interpreted as infections or bioplasmic parasitism. This is also where the great importance of emotional intelligence and training with yogic discipline—dharmakaya—becomes apparent. In this way, these harmful circumstances—which some may romantically refer to as ghosts drawn by our inner demons—will be overcome. It is here that, as therapists, we must lead by example, beyond our own shortcomings—the erratic behavior is not the problem, the problem is denying it.

In my particular case, I understand that this training is like an endless school; therefore, I accept that I will never finish learning completely. However, my ego also allows me to accept that I have achieved a certain level of mastery, and for this reason, I can gratefully help those who seek my chiropractic hypnosis therapy, and with humility and confidence, lead by example.

I know that my profession is very controversial because it touches on sensitive issues, but please don't take anything personally. I admire those who excel in their profession—because they enjoy it and have empirical knowledge. It would be wonderful if this were reciprocal, and if it isn't, I have no choice but to accept it nonetheless.

I would love to elaborate further, to explain in psychotronic terms how the medium's connection or bridge works, but it's not something that can simply be intellectualized; it's truly empirical, just as science is endogenous. I'll leave you with this last point: conventional science calls that electrical neuronal connection, rare in humans—or so they say—a synapse gap. And of course, if one isn't trained to achieve this type of synaptogenesis, most neurotransmitters will be created only as chemical structures, and that's where pathological synapses or neuroses proliferate, in the waters, which are broken by electrolysis—the electrical current of the synapse gap. Thus, a high IQ can be hiding a high degree of neurosis, even though it may seem the opposite—as if it were a great display. Every high IQ must be a consequence of a high EQ—emotional quotient, intelligence—otherwise, sooner or later, it will bring a major emotional crisis, something like a computer system calling a well-known function. Karma—an algorithm that responds to another, the principle of cause and effect. What I'm sharing with you isn't just part of my own study; I, the undersigned, have been its own lab rat—I've had a rough time.

Now, before judging a medium, no matter how ridiculous they act, just breathe and become aware of all this. The only thing that's real is experience. If you don't understand what's happening, be aware that it's just your experience; accept that you're not understanding it. And if you offer an opinion, just note it down as such, as your opinion, not as the truth. A medium, or a clairvoyant, or whatever, isn't a jukebox to do whatever you ask whenever you ask; that would be violent and disrespectful of you. It's also true that there are scammers, or fools, but you find them everywhere. If we truly want to be consistent and kind, let's set an example in every aspect of our lives.

This article may be an opinion, but it's based on my research—empirical and clinical verification. It's part of my essay and my profession, so please don't take it personally. It's not an absolute truth, just a truth that invites discernment.